Abolishing Poverty in The United States :: Poverty Essays

Abolishing Poverty in The United StatesIf I had the power to abate poverty in the United States I would doit in a second. Abolishing poverty would be almost impossible because there arejust to many paltry hatful for one person to help. To abolish poverty we must allwork to help those who are poor get out of this condition.There are two types of poor, there are multitude who are relatively poorand there are slew who are perfectly poor. People who are relatively poorare poor compared to the people around them. These people usually only havethe bare necessities to survive like food, clothing or shelter. They power evenhave a fast(a) job but they just dont have any real wealth. In fact people whoare relatively poor are usually in the lower 5% of the population in terms ofwealth. People who live the state of absolute poverty can not sustain a received level of living . These people have a hard time getting money for food ,clothing, or shelter. People who are absolutely poor have a rough time gettingmoney to put food on the table one day and the next day they might not have anymoney to put food on the table. Not all people who are relatively poor areabsolutely poor, but, all people who are absolutely poor are relatively poor.These types of poor are found all throughout the world especially inunderdeveloped countries. In the United States a advanced well-developedcountry both(prenominal) absolute and relative poverty are present throughout the country.I guess that absolute poverty has no beneficial purposes to society.However, relative poverty does have beneficial functions. I think that relativepoverty can make people competitive. It would do this because people always tryto do better then the people around them. This competitiveness might forcepeople to work overtime or even two jobs in order to make more than the peoplearound them. There are some major monetary values that both povertys have on society.These costs include In areas of high poverty there ar e usually the same areasof high violence. A second cost to society might be that some people inpoverty might become eudaemonia dependent, this means that they rely solely onwelfare to pay for everything and they dont even try to find a job of thereown. These negative costs definitely outweigh the benefits.If I had control of the poverty seat in the United States I wouldonly try to eliminate absolute poverty. I first would raise the taxes of the